Student author: Lea Simms
Student author: Emily Abromowitz
Although “fat talk” is associated with increased eating disorder risk, the predictors of fat talk engagement and viable alternatives to these pervasive conversations remain unclear. The current experiment examined responses to fat talk versus feminist-oriented challenging fat talk scenarios. Undergraduate women (N = 283) completed baseline questionnaires assessing body dissatisfaction, fat talk engagement, and positive impression management. One week later, they were randomized to view one of the two scenarios, followed by assessment of mood, fat talk engagement, social acceptability, and social likeability. Results indicated that the challenging fat talk vignette (versus the fat talk vignette) yielded less negative affect and fat talk and was perceived as more socially attractive with a more likeable target character. Baseline body dissatisfaction, baseline fat talk tendencies, and momentary negative affect predicted post-exposure fat talk engagement. Current findings highlight possibilities for implementing feminist language and psychoeducation in fat talk prevention efforts.
Ambwani, Suman; Baumgardner, Megan; Guo, Cai; Simms, Lea; and Abromowitz, Emily, "Challenging Fat Talk: An Experimental Investigation of Reactions to Body Disparaging Conversations" (2017). Dickinson College Faculty Publications. Paper 709.
Available for download on Sunday, September 01, 2019