Roles

Student author: Lea Simms
Student author: Emily Abromowitz

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

9-2017

Department

Psychology

Language

English

Publication Title

Body Image

Abstract

Although “fat talk” is associated with increased eating disorder risk, the predictors of fat talk engagement and viable alternatives to these pervasive conversations remain unclear. The current experiment examined responses to fat talk versus feminist-oriented challenging fat talk scenarios. Undergraduate women (N = 283) completed baseline questionnaires assessing body dissatisfaction, fat talk engagement, and positive impression management. One week later, they were randomized to view one of the two scenarios, followed by assessment of mood, fat talk engagement, social acceptability, and social likeability. Results indicated that the challenging fat talk vignette (versus the fat talk vignette) yielded less negative affect and fat talk and was perceived as more socially attractive with a more likeable target character. Baseline body dissatisfaction, baseline fat talk tendencies, and momentary negative affect predicted post-exposure fat talk engagement. Current findings highlight possibilities for implementing feminist language and psychoeducation in fat talk prevention efforts.

Comments

Published as:
Ambwani, Suman, Megan Baumgardner, Cai Guo, Lea Simms, and Emily Abromowitz. "Challenging Fat Talk: An Experimental Investigation of Reactions to Body Disparaging Conversations." Body Image 23 (2017): 85-92. (Available online September 5, 2017)

This author post-print is made available on Dickinson Scholar with the permission of the publisher. For more information on the published version, visit Science Direct's Website.

DOI

10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.08.007

Available for download on Sunday, September 01, 2019

Included in

Psychology Commons

COinS