Document Type

Article

Publication Date

4-2017

Department

Political Science

Language

English

Publication Title

Political Science Research and Methods

Abstract

Researchers commonly employ multinomial logit (MNL) models to explain individual-level vote choice while treating “abstention” as the baseline category. Though many view abstainers as a homogeneous group, we argue that these respondents emerge from two distinct sources. Some nonvoters are likely to be “occasional voters” who abstained from a given election owing to temporary factors, such as a distaste for all candidates running in a particular election, poor weather conditions, or other temporary circumstances. On the other hand, many nonvoters are unlikely to vote regardless of the current political climate. This latter population of “routine nonvoters” is consistently disengaged from the political process in a way that is distinct from that of occasional voters. Including both sets of nonvoters within an MNL model can lead to faulty inferences. As a solution, we propose a baseline-inflated MNL estimator that models heterogeneous populations of nonvoters probabilistically, thus accounting for the presence of routine nonvoters within models of vote choice. We demonstrate the utility of this model using replications of existing political behavior research.

Comments

Published as:
Bagozzi, Benjamin E., and Kathleen Marchetti. "Distinguishing Occasional Abstention From Routine Indifference in Models of Vote Choice." Political Science Research and Methods 5, no. 2 (2017): 277-294.

This author post-print is made available on Dickinson Scholar with the permission of the publisher. For more information on the published version, visit Cambridge Unversity Press's Website.

DOI

10.1017/psrm.2015.42

COinS